Duncan Black posts what should be the final nail, but won't be, in Friedman's credibility:I hold out some vague hope that this is out of context.But if it isn't: there you have it, Friedman's underlying rational for the war was an incoherent revenge fantasy based on the "paper tiger" theory of coercive diplomacy. Afghanistan wasn't enough to prick "their bubble," so we had to find another example. Could have been Saudi Arabia, could have been...