It’s a question faced by scientists daily: if you found that X wasn't associated with Y, would you report it? What if you found that treatment X was harmful to Y, would you report your findings? For example, let’s say you are an oncologist and you just concluded, based on years of research, that smoking wasn’t associated with cancer – would you report your findings? What if you were employed by the cancer drug’s maker or dealing with cancer...
Displaying Results for ""
What Western Analysts Got Wrong About the Israeli Election
This is a guest post by Brent Sasley. Sasley is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Texas at Arlington. He blogs at Mideast Matrix and Open Zion. Follow him on Twitter. The Israeli election results are far messier than anyone had hoped, leading to furious debates about who got what right about the Israeli electorate. This seems to be especially true among Western analysts and media that aren’t close...
Monday Morning Linkage
North Korea Bruce Cumings' 2005 LRB article "We Look at It and See Ourselves" surely remains one of the best short articles on the Korean peninsula ever written. It is probably worth a revisit as tensions ramp up again. Paul Gottinger provided a good background piece on "South Korea's New Boss" in Counterpunch. Charles Armstrong, the Director of the Center for Korean Research at Columbia, blogs at CNN's GPS on "Why Sticks Don't Work With North...
Special Relationship at the Crossroads
That Europe is caught up in a major financial crisis isn't news to anyone. Standing right at the crossroads, the Eurozone will either muddle through and risk another crisis onset in the near term or having scraped through its worst crisis in decades take strong steps on the necessary medium and long-term reforms. But what our British friends may not realize is how the vaunted special relationship is also coming to a crossroads. Prime...
Saturday Morning Linkage
The Mali campaign continues. As does the Syrian civil war. And the UN is seeking an expanded mandate in the Congo. Anonymous hacks the United States Sentencing Commission's website in retaliation for aggressive prosecution of Swartz. Jennifer Lind argues that Japanese politicians must confront their country's past. Anton Stezhnev isn't so sure about Chris Fair et al.'s new piece in the Atlantic on drone strikes and Pakistani public opinion....
USC-CSIS Conference on Korean Unification (3): DPRK ‘Sovereignty’ is a Sino-Russian Fig-Leaf to Slow Unification and Check US power
Here are part one and part two of this post. I spoke last Tuesday at a USC-CSIS conference on Korean unification. I learned a lot, and it was very good. If you’re interested in unification, start here with the primary report on which the conference was based. The principal investigators said a final wrap-up report will come at some point, and I’ll put up that link when it arrives. My comments below are on the papers presented on Tuesday about...
Podcast No. 19 – Interview with Daniel Drezner
The nineteenth Duck of Minerva podcast features Daniel Drezner of Tufts University.
Friday Afternoon Linkage — Miscellaneous
Thomas Ricks continues his rant on the dismissal of CENTCOM Commander General James Mattis. Ricks' earlier takes here. Some Teaparty folks think Mattis' dismissal is part of Obama's longer-term intent to kill Americans. Maybe, but at least we know the moon landing wasn't faked. But, really, while Mattis may be a popular and effective leader of Marines, his role at CENTCOM as the face of the American power in the Middle East probably requires a...
The Window on Late Ballot Requests is Closed
Over. Finished. Kaput. We will not send out any more award ballots. The last day to submit your ballot is 31 January. That should clarify things.
Adventures in Reading Comprhension
Yesterday I noted that, with the deadline for casting them fast approaching, we are no longer likely to honor requests for ballots. Since then I've received a deluge of requests for ballots. Not a single one has acknowledged that the deadline has passed -- not even a simple "I know you said, but...." Sigh.
Thursday Morning Linkage: combat exclusion edition
What you need to know about the recent policy change and the reactions. Where to start: the excellent NYT and Washington Post articles on the removal of the exclusion. Here's a great breakdown on storify of the "some things to know" about the exclusion and the changes. Rachel Maddow weighs in on her blog, calling the change a dramatic step forward. Josh Voorhees on the Slate reminds readers that the proposal gives the military three years to...
Lifting the Combat Ban for Women: why the policy change is the right choice
Today it was announced that the combat ban for women will be fully removed within the US military. This reverses a long-standing policy that restricts women from serving below the brigade level in positions specified as front-line, ground combat. Given that the policy had been recently reviewed, the change may come as a surprise to some, however there are three main reasons why this policy had to be changed right now. First, Secretary of...